Dwight Steward Ph.D. provides a critique of the opposing economic expert report in this case. The opposing expert attempts to provide an calculation of alleged lost earnings capacity lost household services and mental anguish. In his report Dr. Steward’s states that the opposing economic analysis is fundamentally flawed and artificially inflates the alleged economic damages. He elaborates that the report wrongly inflates the value of future wage losses calculates lost household services when they are inappropriate in the case and uses an incomplete and unreliable economic model. Dr. Steward reviewed a recent vocational assessment that states that the plaintiff is qualified for many positions that pay as much or more than her previous position with the defendant. Based on his economic and labor market analysis Dr. Steward expresses his opinion that the plaintiff has suffered no losses to her future earnings capacity.