Economists find that larger payday loans lead to LOWER default rates

payday

Economists, Will Dobbie and Paige Mart Skiba, in their paper,  use data from Payday lenders in a number states to estimate an econometric model of the payday loan model.  Their paper uses borrower income,  demographic information, and loan eligibility details to test for moral hazard and adverse selection in the payday loan market.

They find no evidence of moral hazard.  A larger loan actually decreases the probability of a default.  They find that a $50 larger payday loan leads to a 17 to 33 percent drop in the probability of default.    In addition, their results show the relationship between factors such as credit score (-), home owner ship (-), income (-) and age(-) on the probability of default.

Definition: In economic theory, a moral hazard is a situation where a party will have a tendency to take risks because the costs that could incur will not be felt by the party taking the risk

 

Related Posts

Posted by Dwight Steward, Ph.D. | Credit Markets | Industry | Pay day lending | Uncategorized

Big payday loans make economic sense

Bonuses for large loans are a current trend in payday loan lending circles. As discussed in this blog, larger payday loans have a lower default rate. Offering a bonus for […]

Posted by Dwight Steward, Ph.D. | Credit Markets | Pay day lending

Recent payday loan research

  Adams, William, Liran Einav, and Jonathan Levin. 2009. “Liquidity Constraints and Imperfect Information in Subprime Lending.” American Economic Review 99 (1): 49-84. Agarwal, Sumit, Paige Marta Skiba, and Jeremy […]